When making decisions:

Consider both explicit AND implicit cost

One of the main differences between Economics and Accounting

We have to compute marginal benefit (MB) and marginal cost (MC)

Marginal benefit: Additional benefit when making the deicision

Marginal cost: Additional cost paid to make the decision

Ignore past cost (sunk cost)

Ex: When deciding whether or not to continue working on a project, ignore the past cost for getting to this point when calculating the benefit and cost


Classwork

a.

Marginal benefit: 800</font> Marginal cost: <font color="#ffc000">600
worth it
Sunk cost: $1000

b.

Marginal benefit: 500</font> Marginal cost:<font color="#ffc000"> 600
not worth it
Sunk cost: $1000


## Scarcity / Limited Resources:

Absolute

Can not be increased
Ex: Time

Relative

Relative to location or demand
Ex: Oil/Gas/Food

Economics vs. Islamic Economics

Economics:

focuses on efficiency only (maximizing profit and minimizing loss).

Islamic Economics:

-Does the same as former, but also valuing fairness and equality.

-If they were to be applied, many world problems like world hunger and climate change would be greatly reduced if not completely fixed.

-Benefits both the rich and the poor.

-Scarcity is relative. Context I found about this on Google 🔽

PPF

Production Possiblities Frontier (PPF)

Good 1Good 2
A00420
B14318
C27214
D3918
E41000
Time is absolute (can’t be changed), and goods are relative.

Q: What’s the opportunity cost of producting one more unit of good 1 if the third hour is added? (as in we’re at the second hour and we add to the third)

*The opportunity cost of producing 1 unit more = loss / gain

2/6= 3 units

Efficient points: on the curve itself (A, B, C)
Inefficient points: beneath the curve (D)
Attainable points: Efficient points + Inefficient points
Unattainable points: outside of what the PPF curve covers (E)

note: Y and Z are hypothetical points for demonstration purposes only; they don’t actually exist in the real graph.